CET6 2018年12月 第2套

CET6 2018年12月 第2套 · 听力

• 00:00:38 - Section A · 第 1 篇 · 1–4 题
• 00:03:39 - Section A · 第 2 篇 · 5–8 题
• 00:07:28 - Section B · 第 1 篇 · 9–11 题
• 00:10:18 - Section B · 第 2 篇 · 12–15 题
• 00:13:56 - Section C · 第 1 篇 · 16–18 题
• 00:17:59 - Section C · 第 2 篇 · 19–21 题
• 00:22:16 - Section C · 第 3 篇 · 22–25 题

• 原页面：https://english-exam.lazynote.cn/cet6/sections/listening/2018-12-2/
• 音频包含开场说明；第一个正式分段从 00:38 开始。

Transcript

Questions 1–4

1 M: Do you mind taking my photo with the statue over there? I think it will make a great shot.

2 W: Sure, no worries. You’re always taking photos. What do you do with all the photos you take?

3 M: Well, don’t laugh. My dream is to become an online celebrity of sorts.

4 W: You are not serious, are you?

5 M: I am, completely. I just got the idea a few months ago after posting some holiday photos on my social media accounts. A lot of people liked my photos and started asking me for travel tips. So I figured I’d give it a go. I post a lot on social media anyway. So I’ve got nothing to lose.

6 W: I guess that’s true. So what do you have to do to become Internet famous?

7 M: Surprisingly a lot more than I did as a hobby. Recently, I’ve been spending a lot more time editing photos, posting online and clearing storage on my phone. It’s always full now.

8 W: That doesn’t sound like too much work.

9 M: Well, there’s more to it. I spent all last weekend researching what topics are popular, what words to use in captions and similar accounts to follow. It really was a lot to take in. And I was up well past midnight. I’d say it’s paying off though. I increased the number of people following my accounts by 15% already.

10 W: That is impressive. I guess I never thought much about all the effort behind the scenes. Now that I think about it, there’s always something wrong with my photos as it is—half smiles, closed eyes, messy hair. I hope you have better luck than I do. Then again, I think the only person interested in my photos is my mom.

Questions 5–8

1 M: Good evening and welcome to Physics Today. Here we interview some of the greatest minds in physics as they help us to understand some of the most complicated theories. Today, I’m very pleased to welcome Dr. Melissa Phillips, professor of theoretical physics. She’s here to tell us a little about what it is she studies. Dr. Phillips, you seem to study everything.

2 W: I guess that would be fair to say I spend most of my time studying the Big Bang theory and where our universe came from.

3 M: Can you tell us a little about that?

4 W: Well, I’m very interested in why the universe exists at all. That may sound odd, but the fact is at the moment of the Big Bang, both matter and anti-matter were created for a short time, and I mean just a fraction of a second. The whole universe was a super-hot soup of radiation filled with these particles. So What’s baffled scientists for so long is “why is there a universe at all?”

5 M: That’s because matter and anti-matter are basically opposites of each other. They are exactly alike, except that they have opposite electrical charges. So when they collide, they destroy each other?

6 W: Exactly. So during the first few moments of the Big Bang, the universe was extremely hot and very small. Matter and the now more exotic anti-matter would have had little space to avoid each other. This means that they should have totally wiped each other out, leaving the universe completely barren.

7 M: But a recent study seems to point to the fact that when matter and anti-matter were first created, there were slightly more particles of matter, which allowed the universe we all live in to form?

8 W: Exactly. Because there was slightly more matter, the collisions quickly depleted all the anti-matter and left just enough matter to create stars, planets, and eventually us.

Questions 9–11

1 In this week’s edition of special series on Bizarre Medical Conditions, there is a report of the case of Michelle Myers. Myers is an American woman who woke up one day speaking with a British accent, even though she’s lived in the United States all her life. In 2015, Myers went to bed with a terrible headache. She woke up sounding like someone from England. Her British accent has remained for the past two years. Previously, Myers had woken up speaking in Irish and Australian accents. However, on both of those occasions, the accents lasted for only a week.

2 Myers has been diagnosed with Foreign Accent Syndrome. It’s a disorder in which a person experiences a sudden change to their speech so that they sound like they are speaking in a foreign accent. The condition is most often caused by a stroke or traumatic brain injury. Although people with the syndrome have intelligible speech, their manner of speaking is altered in terms of timing and tongue placement, which may distort their pronunciation. The result is that they may sound foreign when speaking their native language. It’s not clear whether Myers has experienced a stroke or other brain damage, but she also has a separate medical condition, which can result in loose joints, easily bruised skin and other problems.

3 Foreign Accent Syndrome is rare, with only about 60 cases reported within the past century. However, a different American woman reportedly spoke with a Russian accent in 2010 after she fell down the stairs and hit her head.

Questions 12–15

1 There is something about water that makes it a good metaphor for life. That may be one reason why so many people find relief in swimming when life’s seas get rough? And it goes some way towards explaining why books about swimming, in which people tackle icy lakes, race in rivers and overcome oceans while reflecting on their lives, have recently become so popular.

2 These books reflect a trend, particularly strong in Britain, where swimming in pools is declining, but more and more folks are opting for open water. “Wild swimming” seems to be especially popular among women. Jenny Landreth recently published a guide to the best swimming spots in London. Her new book, Swell, interweaves her own story with a history of female pioneers who accomplished remarkable feats and paved the way for future generations.

3 Notions of modesty restricted women in the Victorian era, but they still swam. A “bathing machine” was rolled down to the seashore so women would not be seen in swimwear. In 1892, The Gentlewoman’s Book of Sport described a woman swimming in a heavy dress, boots, hat, gloves and carrying an umbrella.

4 Eventually, swimming became freer. Mixed bathing was permitted on British beaches in 1901. Women won the right to swim in public pools, learned to swim properly, created appropriate swimwear and, in time, even competed against men. The first woman to cross the English Channel was Gertrude Ederle in 1926. She beat the record by almost two hours and her father rewarded her with a red sports car.

Questions 16–18

1 Today I’m going to talk about a very special kind of person. Psychologists call them “masters of deception”, those rare individuals with a natural ability to tell with complete confidence when someone is telling a lie. For decades, researchers and law enforcement agencies have tried to build a machine that will do the same thing.

2 Now a company in Massachusetts says that by using magnetic brain scans they can determine with 97% accuracy whether someone is telling the truth. They hope that the technology will be cleared for use in American courts by early next year. But is this really the ultimate tool for you, the lawyers of tomorrow?

3 You’ll not find many brain scientists celebrating this breakthrough. The company might be very optimistic, but the ability of their machine to detect deception has not provided credible proof. That’s because the technology has not been properly tested in real-world situations. In life, there are different kinds of lies and diverse contexts in which they’re told. These differences may elicit different brain responses. Does their hypothesis behind the test apply in every case? We don’t know the answer, because studies done on how reliable this machine is have not yet been duplicated. Much more research is badly needed.

4 Whether the technology is eventually deemed reliable enough for the courts will ultimately be decided by the judges. Let’s hope they’re wise enough not to be fooled by a machine that claims to determine truthfulness at the flick of a switch. They should also be sceptical of the growing tendency to try to reduce all human traits and actions to the level of brain activity. Often, they do not map that easily.

5 Moreover, understanding the brain is not the same as understanding the mind. Some researchers have suggested that thoughts cannot properly be seen as purely “internal”. Instead, thoughts make sense only in reference to the individual’s external world. So while there may be insights to be gained from matching behavior to brain activity, those insights will not necessarily lead to justice in a court of law. Problems surround the use of machines to spot deception, at least until it has been rigorously tested.

6 A high-tech test that can tell when a person is not telling the truth sounds too good to be true. And when something sounds too good to be true, it usually is.

Questions 19–21

1 Last week I attended a research workshop on an island in the South Pacific. Thirty people were present and all except me came from the island, called Makelua, in the nation of Vanuatu. They live in 16 different communities and speak 16 distinct languages. In many cases, you could stand at the edge of one village and see the outskirts of the next community. Yet the residents of each village speak a completely different language. According to recent work by my colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, this island, just 100 kilometers long and 20 kilometers wide, is home to speakers of perhaps 40 different indigenous languages.

2 Why so many? We could ask the same question of the entire globe. People don’t speak one universal language, or even a handful. Instead, today our species collectively speaks over 7,000 distinct languages. And these languages are not spread randomly across the planet. For example, far more languages are found in tropical regions than in the mild zones. The tropical island of New Guinea is home to over 900 languages. Russia, 20 times larger, has 105 indigenous languages. Even within the tropics, language diversity varies widely. For example, the 250,000 people who live on Vanuatu’s 80 islands speak 110 different languages, but in Bangladesh, a population 600 times greater speaks only 41 languages.

3 How come humans speak so many languages? And why are they so unevenly spread across the planet? As it turns out, we have few clear answers to these fundamental questions about how humanity communicates. Most people can easily brainstorm possible answers to these intriguing questions. They hypothesize that language diversity must be about history, cultural differences, mountains or oceans dividing populations. But when our diverse team of researchers from six different disciplines and eight different countries began to review what was known, we were shocked that only a dozen previous studies had been done, including one we ourselves completed on language diversity in the Pacific. These prior efforts all examined the degree to which different environmental, social, and geographic variables correlated with the number of languages found in a given location. The results varied a lot from one study to another, and no clear patterns emerged. The studies also ran up against many methodological challenges, the biggest of which centered on the old statistical saying—correlation does not equal causation.

Questions 22–25

1 We often hear people say that America is a land of opportunity, a country built on hope to inspire the greatness of the American dream. But is the dream as we once knew it dying? Today’s demographics show that the middle-class is disappearing and now the richest 1% of the population has amassed more wealth than the bottom 90%. Once upon a time, Americans thought that if they worked hard enough, even in the face of adversity, they would be rewarded with success. These days, though, the divide between rich and poor is greater than it has ever been.

2 The question is, What is it going to take to change things? Maybe one day soon real change will actually be made in our nation and the gap will be eradicated. But what happens in the meantime? Is there something that we can do to help close the gap? Is there something that we can do to prove that a little compassion goes a long way? If we want to fix the problem of the income gap, first, we have to understand it. It is a grim reality that you can have one person who only makes around $13,000 a year, or across town, another is making millions. For me, it is kind of astonishing. And if you ask low-income people what’s the one thing that will change their life, they’ll say a “full-time job.” That’s all they aspire to. So why is it so difficult for so many people to find employment? It partly comes down to profit-driven business models that are built around low-wage work and part-time jobs that don’t provide benefits. Businesses, in order to boost profits, hire employees as part-time workers only. This means they are paid the lowest legal wage and receive no health care or other benefits provided to full-time employees.

3 Simultaneously, technological advancement and a global economy have reduced the demand for well-paying blue-collar jobs here in the United States. The cumulative effect of these two factors is that many Americans are forced to take two or more part-time jobs, just to make ends meet. What has become obvious to me when it comes to the income gap is that there needs to be an opportunity for the people at the bottom to push them back up and push them into the middle-class to give them hope in their lives.

Questions, Answers & Analysis

Section A · Long Conversations

1. What does the man ask the woman to do?

• A. Stop worrying about him.
• B. Keep away from the statue.
• C. Take a picture of him.
• D. Put on a smile for the photo.

Answer: C — Take a picture of him.

M: Do you mind taking my photo with the statue over there? I think it will make a great shot.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• taking my photo ↔ Take a picture of him

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• D.

2. What does the man dream of?

• A. Gaining great fame on the Internet.
• B. Publishing a collection of his photos.
• C. Collecting the best photos in the world.
• D. Becoming a professional photographer.

Answer: A — Gaining great fame on the Internet.

M: Well, don’t laugh. My dream is to become an online celebrity of sorts.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• an online celebrity ↔ Gaining great fame on the Internet

Why the other options are wrong

• B.
• C.
• D.

3. What has the man been busy doing recently?

• A. Surfing various websites and collecting photos.
• B. Editing his pictures and posting them online.
• C. Following similar accounts to compare notes.
• D. Studying the pictures in popular social media.

Answer: B — Editing his pictures and posting them online.

M: Surprisingly a lot more than I did as a hobby. Recently, I’ve been spending a lot more time editing photos, posting online and clearing storage on my phone.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• editing photos ↔ Editing his pictures
• posting online ↔ posting them online

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• C.
• D.

4. What does the woman say about her photos?

• A. They are far from satisfactory.
• B. They are mostly taken by her mom.
• C. They make an impressive album.
• D. They record her fond memories.

Answer: A — They are far from satisfactory.

W: Now that I think about it, there’s always something wrong with my photos as it is—half smiles, closed eyes, messy hair.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• there’s always something wrong with my photos ↔ They are far from satisfactory

Why the other options are wrong

• B.
• C.
• D.

5. What does the man say is Physics Today?

• A. A journal reporting the latest progress in physics.
• B. An introductory course of modern physics.
• C. An occasion for physicists to exchange ideas.
• D. A series of interviews with outstanding physicists.

Answer: D — A series of interviews with outstanding physicists.

Here we interview some of the greatest minds in physics as they help us to understand some of the most complicated theories.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• we interview some of the greatest minds in physics ↔ A series of interviews with outstanding physicists.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• C.

6. What is the woman physicist’s main research area?

• A. The future of the physical world.
• B. The origin of the universe.
• C. Sources of radiation.
• D. Particle theory.

Answer: B — The origin of the universe.

I spend most of my time studying the Big Bang theory and where our universe came from.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• where our universe came from ↔ The origin of the universe.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• C.
• D.

7. What is the woman interested in?

• A. How matter collides with anti-matter.
• B. Whether the universe will turn barren.
• C. Why there exists anti-matter.
• D. Why there is a universe at all.

Answer: D — Why there is a universe at all.

Well, I’m very interested in why the universe exists at all.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• why the universe exists at all ↔ Why there is a universe at all.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• C.

8. What seems to be the finding of the recent study?

• A. Matter and anti-matter are opposites of each other.
• B. Anti-matter allowed humans to come into existence.
• C. The universe formed due to a sufficient amount of matter.
• D. Anti-matter exists in very high-temperature environments.

Answer: C — The universe formed due to a sufficient amount of matter.

But a recent study seems to point to the fact that when matter and anti-matter were first created, there were slightly more particles of matter, which allowed the universe we all live in to form?

Analysis

Paraphrase

• there were slightly more particles of matter, which allowed the universe we all live in to form ↔ The universe formed due to a sufficient amount of matter.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• D.

Section B · Passages

9. What happened to Michelle Myers one day?

• A. She found herself speaking a foreign language.
• B. She woke up speaking with a different accent.
• C. She found some symptoms of her illness gone.
• D. She woke up finding herself in another country.

Answer: B — She woke up speaking with a different accent.

Myers is an American woman who woke up one day speaking with a British accent, even though she’s lived in the United States all her life.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• speaking with a British accent ↔ speaking with a different accent
• woke up one day ↔ woke up

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• C.
• D.

10. What does the passage say about Foreign Accent Syndrome?

• A. It is usually caused by a stroke or brain injury.
• B. It has not yet found any effective treatment.
• C. It leaves the patient with a distorted memory.
• D. It often happens to people with speech defects.

Answer: A — It is usually caused by a stroke or brain injury.

The condition is most often caused by a stroke or traumatic brain injury.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• most often caused by a stroke or traumatic brain injury ↔ usually caused by a stroke or brain injury

Why the other options are wrong

• B.
• C.
• D.

11. What accent did another American woman speak with after a head injury?

• A. British.
• B. Irish.
• C. Russian.
• D. Australian.

Answer: C — Russian.

However, a different American woman reportedly spoke with a Russian accent in 2010 after she fell down the stairs and hit her head.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• spoke with a Russian accent ↔ Russian.
• after she fell down the stairs and hit her head ↔ Russian.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• D.

12. What has become so popular recently?

• A. Water sports.
• B. Racing in rivers.
• C. Stories about women swimmers.
• D. Books about swimming.

Answer: D — Books about swimming.

And it goes some way towards explaining why books about swimming, in which people tackle icy lakes, race in rivers and overcome oceans while reflecting on their lives, have recently become so popular.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• books about swimming ↔ Books about swimming.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• C.

13. What did Jenny Landreth do recently?

• A. She succeeded in swimming across the English Channel.
• B. She published a guide to London’s best swimming spots.
• C. She told her story of adventures to some young swimmers.
• D. She wrote a book about the history of swimwear in the UK.

Answer: B — She published a guide to London’s best swimming spots.

Jenny Landreth recently published a guide to the best swimming spots in London.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• published a guide to the best swimming spots in London ↔ published a guide to London’s best swimming spots

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• C.
• D.

14. What do we learn about women in the Victorian era?

• A. They loved vacationing on the seashore.
• B. They had a unique notion of modesty.
• C. They were prohibited from swimming.
• D. They were fully dressed when swimming.

Answer: D — They were fully dressed when swimming.

In 1892, The Gentlewoman’s Book of Sport described a woman swimming in a heavy dress, boots, hat, gloves and carrying an umbrella.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• swimming in a heavy dress, boots, hat, gloves ↔ They were fully dressed when swimming.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• C.

15. What does the passage say about Gertrude Ederle?

• A. She designed lots of appropriate swimwear for women.
• B. She once successfully competed against men in swimming.
• C. She was the first woman to swim across the English Channel.
• D. She was an advocate of women’s right to swim in public pools.

Answer: C — She was the first woman to swim across the English Channel.

The first woman to cross the English Channel was Gertrude Ederle in 1926.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• The first woman to cross the English Channel was Gertrude Ederle ↔ She was the first woman to swim across the English Channel.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• D.

Section C · Lectures

16. What have researchers and law enforcement agencies tried to do?

• A. Build a machine that can detect lies.
• B. Develop a magnetic brain scanner.
• C. Test the credibility of court evidence.
• D. Win people’s complete trust in them.

Answer: A — Build a machine that can detect lies.

For decades, researchers and law enforcement agencies have tried to build a machine that will do the same thing.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• build a machine that will do the same thing ↔ Build a machine that can detect lies.

Why the other options are wrong

• B.
• C.

17. How do many brain scientists respond to the Massachusetts company’s so-called technological breakthrough?

• A. They are optimistic about its potential.
• B. They are sceptical of its reliability.
• C. They think it is but business promotion.
• D. They celebrate it with great enthusiasm.

Answer: B — They are sceptical of its reliability.

You’ll not find many brain scientists celebrating this breakthrough. The company might be very optimistic, but the ability of their machine to detect deception has not provided credible proof.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• has not provided credible proof ↔ They are sceptical of its reliability.
• not find many brain scientists celebrating this breakthrough ↔ They are sceptical of its reliability.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• C.

18. What does the speaker think of using a high-tech test to determine whether a person is telling the truth?

• A. It is not to be trusted at all.
• B. It does not sound economical.
• C. It may intrude into people’s privacy.
• D. It may lead to overuse in court trials.

Answer: A — It is not to be trusted at all.

A high-tech test that can tell when a person is not telling the truth sounds too good to be true. And when something sounds too good to be true, it usually is.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• when something sounds too good to be true, it usually is ↔ It is not to be trusted at all.
• Problems surround the use of machines to spot deception ↔ It is not to be trusted at all.

Why the other options are wrong

• B.
• C.

19. What does the speaker say about the island of Makelua?

• A. Most of its residents speak several languages.
• B. Some of its indigenous languages are dying out.
• C. Each village there speaks a totally different language.
• D. Its languages have interested researchers the world over.

Answer: C — Each village there speaks a totally different language.

Yet the residents of each village speak a completely different language.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• the residents of each village speak a completely different language ↔ Each village there speaks a totally different language

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• D.

20. What do we learn from the talk about languages in the world?

• A. They are spread randomly across the world.
• B. Some are more difficult to learn than others.
• C. More are found in tropical regions than in the mild zones.
• D. They enrich and impact each other in more ways than one.

Answer: C — More are found in tropical regions than in the mild zones.

And these languages are not spread randomly across the planet. For example, far more languages are found in tropical regions than in the mild zones.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• far more languages are found in tropical regions than in the mild zones ↔ More are found in tropical regions than in the mild zones

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• D.

21. What has the diverse team of researchers found about the previous studies on language diversity?

• A. They used different methods to collect and analyze data.
• B. They identified distinct patterns of language distribution.
• C. Their conclusions do not correspond to their original hypotheses.
• D. There is no conclusive account for the cause of language diversity.

Answer: D — There is no conclusive account for the cause of language diversity.

The results varied a lot from one study to another, and no clear patterns emerged.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• no clear patterns emerged ↔ There is no conclusive account for the cause of language diversity
• correlation does not equal causation ↔ the cause of language diversity

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• C.

22. What do the surveys show about America according to the speaker?

• A. Its middle-class is disappearing.
• B. Its wealth is rationally distributed.
• C. Its population is rapidly growing.
• D. Its cherished dream is coming true.

Answer: A — Its middle-class is disappearing.

Today’s demographics show that the middle-class is disappearing and now the richest 1% of the population has amassed more wealth than the bottom 90%.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• the middle-class is disappearing ↔ Its middle-class is disappearing.

Why the other options are wrong

• B.
• C.
• D.

23. What did Americans use to believe?

• A. Success was but a dream without conscientious effort.
• B. They could realize their dreams through hard work.
• C. A few dollars could go a long way.
• D. Wealth was shared by all citizens.

Answer: B — They could realize their dreams through hard work.

Once upon a time, Americans thought that if they worked hard enough, even in the face of adversity, they would be rewarded with success.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• if they worked hard enough ↔ through hard work
• they would be rewarded with success ↔ realize their dreams

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• C.
• D.

24. What do low-income people aspire to?

• A. Better working conditions.
• B. Better-paying jobs.
• C. High social status.
• D. Full employment.

Answer: D — Full employment.

And if you ask low-income people what’s the one thing that will change their life, they’ll say a “full-time job.” That’s all they aspire to.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• full-time job ↔ Full employment.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.
• B.
• C.

25. What do businesses do to increase their revenues?

• A. Reduce the administrative costs.
• B. Adopt effective business models.
• C. Hire part-time employees only.
• D. Make use of the latest technology.

Answer: C — Hire part-time employees only.

Businesses, in order to boost profits, hire employees as part-time workers only.

Analysis

Paraphrase

• hire employees as part-time workers only ↔ Hire part-time employees only.

Why the other options are wrong

• A.

• B.

• D.

• Source: Lazynote listening page

• Chinese text is stored as Obsidian comments (“).